Dr Zakir Naik Vs Sri Sri Ravi Shankar Debate Full [portable] In Hindi -

In his opening, he famously noted that the core difference between the two faiths is an "apostrophe." While many Hindus believe "everything is God" (Pantheism), Muslims believe "everything is God's " (everything belongs to the Creator).

Shankar argued that various deities in Hinduism represent different aspects or "names" of the same ultimate reality, rather than separate gods. dr zakir naik vs sri sri ravi shankar debate full in hindi

The dialogue was structured to compare the nature of divinity using religious texts rather than contemporary cultural practices. In his opening, he famously noted that the

Naik quoted the Rigveda (1:164:46) and Yajurveda (32:3) to argue that Hindu scriptures actually advocate for a formless, singular God. He emphasized the concept of Tawhid (the absolute oneness of God) in Islam. Sri Sri Ravi Shankar’s Approach: Naik quoted the Rigveda (1:164:46) and Yajurveda (32:3)

He argued that the most authentic way to understand a religion is through its sacred scriptures, rather than observing its followers.

The event was marked by significant logistical and legal developments:

The historic 2006 public dialogue between and Sri Sri Ravi Shankar remains one of the most discussed interfaith events in modern history. Titled "The Concept of God in Hinduism and Islam in the Light of Sacred Scriptures," it took place on January 21, 2006, at the Palace Grounds in Bangalore, India.